GOODBY, GRANDFATHER OAK – YOU WERE A GOOD NEIGHBOR

My street is only two short blocks with 8 houses. There are many more trees than houses on these blocks. Mighty oaks, a big black walnut and a massive maple. All but one of the houses are two stories tall with attics, and they are dwarfed by the trees. The houses were built in the early 1900s, and most of the trees were here first.

The canopy they create, stretching over roof tops, reaching out to meet above the streets creates an oasis of cool on hot summer days. Their leaves pile in mountains of earthy color in our yards each fall. In the winter, their revealed architecture casts a web of branches against the sky and frame the stars and moon in the cold, quiet nights.

I live on the west side of a dauntingly steep hill that gave our neighborhood its name – University Heights. On the east side of that hill, Wisconsin soldiers mustered for duty in the Civil War at Camp Randall. They cut a lot of the trees on the east side of the hill and dragged them down to their swampy camp for firewood. But they spared the trees on the west side because hauling them up and over the peak wasn’t worth it.  Now we have the equipment to remove these trees and barely raise a sweat.

So the oaks on this slope are old. They are big. Some have been here over 150 years. Who knows how long they could last? But for a tree, life in the urban forest if filled with risk. They can stand only as long as the current owner of their piece of earth consents.  A tree that has been part of its ecosystem for more than a century can be cut by someone who “owns” it for year, a month, even a day.

For one of these ancient oaks, its last day was today. As I wheeled our garbage can out to the street this morning I was startled to see a huge crane in the next block. A neighbor three houses down was having a tree cut down. It was one of the grandfather oaks. And now it is gone.

I don’t know why they decided to cut it down. Cutting these gentle giants is not a community decision. Perhaps it should be.

Some people see the tons of oak looming over them and feel uneasy. And with good reason. Every now and then, one of them comes down without warning. And when a tree of that magnitude falls, it can sweep a lot of human construction along with it. A few years back, a 6-ton tree limb fell our way from our next door neighbor’s yard. I heard it falling in the night and believed, briefly, that I was a gonner. It hit brushed the outside of my bedroom wall and smashed the porch. The remaining 12 tons had to be taken down because of the seriousness of the injury.

Across the street an oak  had a small hole that had been “treated” in the 1940’s by filling with concrete.  That method is no longer used because the concrete wicks moisture and slowly rotted this timeless sentinel at its heart.  Last year it’s weakened trunk snapped eight feet from the ground one peaceful afternoon, barely missing a parked car.  Its outstretched branches yanked the electric and cable wires out of eight houses (including ours) as it toppled.

So who knows?

It’s gone now.

The tree removal firm was very adept with their crane and their saws and their chipper, and by the end of the day, they swept up the sawdust and drove away. The tree had vanished, cut even with the ground. Below ground, its roots will be in for a shock this spring and then slowly decompose.

The world will miss that tree.

I miss it already.

Advertisements

2 replies

  1. Shouldn’t even have to say that I agree with your sentiments! I’ve known people to move into a new house only a little ways away from us and the first thing they did was cut down some lovely trees in their yard. It’s fair to say that I wanted to strangle them!

    Off-topic: Here’s an article that should be of great interest to you from the National Science Foundation:

    http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=118363&org=NSF&from=news

    The article warns “that, if carbon dioxide emissions continue at their current rate through the end of this century, atmospheric concentrations of the greenhouse gas will reach levels that existed about 30 million to 100 million years ago.

    Global temperatures then averaged about 29 degrees Fahrenheit (16 degrees Celsius) above pre-industrial levels….The study also indicates that the planet’s climate system, over long periods of times, may be at least twice as sensitive to carbon dioxide as currently projected by computer models, which have generally focused on shorter-term warming trends.”

    Not a fun read but important.

    • I hear you, Dennis.
      I have seen it happen too many times myself, and it often seems to be someone who just bought the property. They have the legal (by human law) right and the chain saw to cut through the hard-won life rings of a tree that has been standing there quietly and helpfully (and I didn’t even mention carbon sequestration – which is HUGE) longer than the tree cuttter’s life.
      Why, I ask myself each time, didn’t they just buy won of the gazillion properties built in a former field that has no trees instead of one of the increasingly rare properties with mature trees?
      Sigh

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s